Is EMLA (lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5%) safe for children with glucose‑6‑phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency? | Rounds Is EMLA (lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5%) safe for children with glucose‑6‑phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency? | Rounds
Loading...

Is EMLA (lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5%) safe for children with glucose‑6‑phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency?

Medical Advisory Board
All articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board.

Educational purpose only · Not a substitute for professional judgment or the full text of guidelines and labels.

Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 14, 2026 · View editorial policy

EMLA Use in Children With G6PD Deficiency

EMLA (lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5%) is associated with risk of methemoglobinemia, and children with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency are more susceptible to developing clinical manifestations of methemoglobinemia. [1] In patients with G6PD deficiency, EMLA is generally not preferred unless local anesthetic treatment is necessary, because monitoring for methemoglobinemia is recommended if topical local anesthetics must be used. [1]

Mechanism of Risk: Methemoglobinemia

Prilocaine-containing local anesthetics can cause methemoglobinemia, which presents with cyanotic skin discoloration and/or abnormal coloration of blood. [1] Methemoglobinemia can occur immediately or be delayed for hours after exposure. [1]

Safety Guidance From U.S. Prescribing Information

EMLA labeling states that all patients are at risk for methemoglobinemia. [1] EMLA labeling specifically identifies glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency as a risk factor for developing clinical manifestations of methemoglobinemia. [1] EMLA labeling recommends close monitoring for symptoms and signs of methemoglobinemia when local anesthetics must be used in patients with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. [1] EMLA labeling does not list G6PD deficiency as an absolute contraindication, but it increases susceptibility and increases monitoring requirements. [1]

Clinical Evidence of G6PD-Associated Methemoglobinemia

A pediatric case report described methemoglobinemia occurring after use of prilocaine-containing local anesthetic (prilocaine-lignocaine cream) in a child with partial G6PD deficiency. [2] A separate pediatric case report described methemoglobinemia after circumcision with topical EMLA and infiltration with lidocaine, with methylene blue administered despite unknown G6PD status at presentation. [3]

Practical Monitoring and Action Points

EMLA labeling advises discontinuation of EMLA and any other oxidizing agents when methemoglobinemia is suspected. [1] Depending on severity, supportive care (oxygen therapy, hydration) or treatment with methylene blue, exchange transfusion, or hyperbaric oxygen may be required. [1] Caregivers should be instructed to stop EMLA and seek immediate medical attention for cyanosis or other methemoglobinemia symptoms including pale, gray, or blue colored skin. [1]

Bottom-Line Clinical Position for G6PD Deficiency

EMLA is not considered reliably “safe” for children with G6PD deficiency because susceptibility to methemoglobinemia is increased. [1] If EMLA is used in a child with G6PD deficiency, close monitoring for methemoglobinemia symptoms and prompt discontinuation with appropriate treatment escalation are recommended. [1]

Related Questions